Practice CTFL_Syll2018 Engine | CTFL_Syll2018 Real Dumps Free

In order to serve you better, we have a complete system for you. We offer you free demo for CTFL_Syll2018 exam braindumps, and we recommend you have a try before buying. If you are quite satisfied with the free demo and want the complete version, you just need to add to cart and pay for it. You will receive the downloading link and password for CTFL_Syll2018 Exam Dumps within ten minutes, if you don’t receive, you can contact with us, and we will solve this problem for you. We offer you free update for one year for CTFL_Syll2018 exam dumps after payment, so that you can obtain the latest information for the exam, and the latest information will be sent to you automatically.

ISQI CTFL_Syll2018 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Explain the value of statement and decision coverage Distinguish between the root cause of a defect and its effects
Topic 2	Recognize the different roles and responsibilities in a formal review Identify the tasks of a test manager and tester
Topic 3	Apply equivalence partitioning to derive test cases from given requirements Identify typical objectives of testing
Topic 4	Identify factors that influence the effort related to testing Describe the test activities and respective tasks within the test process
Topic 5	Use examples to describe the value of static testing Apply a review technique to a work product to find defects

>> Practice CTFL_Syll2018 Engine <<

How Itcertmaster will Help You in Passing the CTFL_Syll2018 Exam

It is well known that the best way to improve your competitive advantages in this modern world is to have the CTFL_Syll2018 certification, such as graduation from a first-tier university, fruitful experience in a well-known international company, or even possession of some globally recognized CTFL_Syll2018 certifications, which can totally help you highlight your resume and get a promotion in your workplace to a large extend. As a result, our CTFL_Syll2018 Study Materials raise in response to the proper time and conditions while an increasing number of people are desperate to achieve success and become the elite.

ISQI CTFL_Syll2018, also known as the ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level (Syllabus 2018) exam, is a certification exam designed for professionals who want to validate their knowledge and skills in software testing. CTFL_Syll2018 exam is based on the latest syllabus developed by the International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) and covers a wide range of topics related to software testing.

ISQI ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level (Syllabus 2018) Sample Questions (Q152-Q157):

NEW QUESTION # 152
Which TWO of the following test tools would be classified as test execution tools? [K2] a. Test data preparation tools b. Test harness c. Review tools d. Test comparators e. Configuration management tools

A. c and d
B. a and b
C. c and e
D. b and d

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
The test tools that would be classified as test execution tools are D. b and d. Test execution tools are tools that automate the execution of test cases or test scripts, and compare the actual results with the expected results.
Test execution tools can also record and replay user actions, generate test data, and report test results. Test harness and test comparators are examples of test execution tools. A test harness is a tool that creates a test environment for a component or system under test, by simulating the required dependencies, such as stubs, drivers, or mock objects. A test comparator is a tool that compares the actual outputs of a component or system under test with the expected outputs, and reports any differences or anomalies. A detailed explanation of test execution tools can be found in A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus, pages 111-1121.

NEW QUESTION # 153
What is a peer review?

A. A review done by colleagues at the same organizational level
B. A review done by developers only
C. An informal review without moderator
D. A review done by developers and testers together

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
A peer review is a review done by colleagues at the same organizational level, such as developers, testers, or managers. An informal review without moderator is called a walkthrough. A review done by developers and testers together is called an inspection. A review done by developers only is not a specific type of review.
References: Certified Tester Foundation Level (CTFL) Syllabus - ASTQB, Section 3.1.1, Page 18

NEW QUESTION # 154
You have been asked to improve the way test automation tools are being used in your company.
Which one of the following is the BEST approach?

A. Using a keyword-driven testing approach to separate the actions and data from the tool's script
B. Selecting and automating scripts that test new functionality to find the most defects
C. Keeping expected results separate from the automation tool to allow the testers to check the results
D. Ensuring that all data, inputs and actions are stored in the tool's script for ease of maintenance

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
Using a keyword-driven testing approach to separate the actions and data from the tool's script is the best approach to improve the way test automation tools are being used in your company, because it allows for more flexibility, maintainability, and reusability of automated test scripts1 . A keyword-driven testing approach uses keywords or commands to represent actions or data in the test scripts, which can be stored in external files or tables and accessed by the tool1 . The other options are not good approaches to improve the way test automation tools are being used in your company. Option A is not a good approach, because selecting and automating scripts that test new functionality to find the most defects does not consider the suitability, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of automation1 . Option C is not a good approach, because ensuring that all data, inputs and actions are stored in the tool's script for ease of maintenance makes the test scripts more rigid, complex, and difficult to modify1 . Option D is not a good approach, because keeping expected results separate from the automation tool to allow the testers to check the results reduces the efficiency and reliability of automation and increases the manual effort

NEW QUESTION # 155
You are testing an e-commerce system The system accepts four different types of Credit Cards; each card has its own rules for valid and invalid numbers. The following is a portion of the Decision Table for Order Management.:

The combination of the conditions Valid Card Number (NO) + Purchase Approved (YES) is not feasible.
You wish to perform a test which completely covers all the combinations of equivalence partitioning tor the different types of credit card, according to the rules shown in the above Decision Table How many test cases do you need?

A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 3

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
The combination of the conditions Valid Card Number (NO) + Purchase Approved (YES) is not feasible, as a purchase cannot be approved with an invalid card number. Therefore, this combination can be ignored in the equivalence partitioning for the different types of credit card. Each type of credit card has two valid equivalence partitions: Valid Card Number (YES) + Purchase Approved (YES) and Valid Card Number (YES) + Purchase Approved (NO). Each type of credit card also has one invalid equivalence partition: Valid Card Number (NO) + Purchase Approved (NO). Therefore, to cover all the combinations of equivalence partitions for the four types of credit card, we need 4 x (2 + 1) = 12 test cases.
A, B, and D are incorrect answers. A implies that there are two equivalence partitions for each type of credit card, which is not true as there are three. B implies that there is only one equivalence partition for each type of credit card, which is not true as there are two valid ones and one invalid one. D implies that there are four equivalence partitions for each type of credit card, which is not true as there are only three.

NEW QUESTION # 156
What does the term Pesticide paradox' refer to?

A. Reduced effectiveness of test cases that are repeated and focused on the same scenarios
B. The redundancy of testing the same objects in both black and white box techniques
C. The decreasing efficiency of debugging when done in code that has many bugs
D. The phenomena where a piece of code that has a lot of bugs is likely to have more hidden, yet unfound

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The term 'Pesticide paradox' refers to the phenomenon where the effectiveness of test cases that are repeated and focused on the same scenarios decreases over time because they tend to find the same defects or no defects at all. This is because the system under test becomes more resistant or immune to the existing test cases, just like pests become more resistant or immune to pesticides over time. To overcome the pesticide paradox, test cases should be regularly reviewed and updated to cover new or changed requirements, scenarios, risks, or defects. Test cases should also be designed to cover different aspects and perspectives of the system under test, such as functionality, usability, performance, security, etc. You can find more information about the pesticide paradox in A Study Guide to the ISTQB Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus, Chapter 4, Section 4.11.

NEW QUESTION # 157
......

CTFL_Syll2018 Real Dumps Free: https://www.itcertmaster.com/CTFL_Syll2018.html